![]() "Path\To\FreeFileSync\FreeFileSync. Options presets to have different methods! Using this idea my CMD file is now: Even more youĬould create multiple viaEnviron.ffs_gui files with different synchronizing Run a FreeFileSync batch job In order to start synchronization in batch mode, supply the path of a ffsbatch configuration file as the first argument after the FreeFileSync executable: FreeFileSync 'D:\Backup Projects. To have exactly the synchronization method and filters you want. Suggestion by Zenju is that you can set the target viaEnviron.ffs_gui file One great characteristic of this method compared to the updated command line Window is hidden and the FFS window shows up. So, I used a batch/cmd file to exeĬonverter from This program has an option to make theĪpplication invisible. Thanks for the greatįrom my perspective, there was one annoyance with it. ![]() What grobbla suggested does work as described. If the first command argument is an existing directory, FFS will create a temporary configuration and unconditionally add all other arguments into a list of folder pairs and start FFS in GUI mode with sync variant set to mirror. If a single ffs_batch is passed, FFS starts in batch mode.Ģ. Batch Scripting FreeFileSync can be called from command line and supports integration into batch scripts. These will be merged and FFS starts in gui mode. user passes one or multiple, mixed combinations of ffs_gui/ffs_batch files. The new command line operates in two modes:ġ. The current command line interface is very simple, and adding thisįeature can be done without negative impact on any of the other features. Integration into another tool seems important enough a usecase to justify anĮxception. However having the possibility to pass a list of directories to ease Options, nor is this possible in a proper way with he constraints of aĬommandline (limited command length, lacking unicode support). Neitherĭo I want to duplicate each means to specify the various configuration The GUI helps for these one-off small jobs.I have somewhat mixed feelings about accepting input data other than FFSĬonfiguration files, which are currently the single one "interface". Its a GUI for rsync which I find useful, but arcane. It also does versioning, which is bloody excellent.įor one off big files (500GB, 850GB and 1TB veracrypt blobs) I use Grsync, to ensure they are actually copied properly, I use Grsync. I use FreeFileSync - which is free AND works on both Linux + Win - to ensure my backups are placed and copied correctly. 1 Sync Two External Hard Drives using XCOPY command-line XCOPY is a built-in command-line tool for. The 1TB drive is encrypted with Veracrypt. Let’s check how to use these tools for syncing two external hard drives. (This windows corruption is because Linux's support of GDrive is slow as hell) Everything from GDrive is copied to that 1TB drive. This is because I know GDrive will one day just disappear (as all google product do) or they may arbitrarily just ban and ghost me, which is a habit of theirs. File times have to be equal or differ by exactly. If the differences are caused by changing the time zone, enter one or more time shifts as needed. I use Win10 in a VM and that has Google Drive to talk to a 1TB rusty disk. In FreeFileSyncs comparison settings you can enter one or more time shifts to ignore during comparison: If you need to handle differences due to daylight saving time, enter a single one hour shift. plus a 2TB rusty internal disk to act as a bulk storage dump I've a 1TB rusty hard drive attached to the router to act as a NAS Not to do with Mint specifically, but I do a LOT of automated backups. ![]() If so, don't worry about it, USB storage is slow, just be patient. ![]() If that number is about 1.5G and it's constantly decreasing as you run the command repeatedly, then the system responds again when the number gets smaller, the theory is correct. If you want to confirm this theory, run this in a terminal when the system hangs: grep Dirty /proc/meminfo So when you copy a file to USB, the first 1.5G goes to very fast RAM, and the rest blocks on the very slow USB drive. There's a limit to how much the system can have in this temporary in-memory state. If you want to look these terms up more, they are called pagecache and dirty pages and flushing. This is why you need to eject a USB drive properly, so the system has time to write those in-memory files to the USB drive (and cleanly close the filesystem). This means when you go "File, Save" in a program, it looks like your file is written to disk, but actually that file only exists in memory. All modern operating systems use "asynchronous I/O". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |